Ad-interim injunction has been reportedly issued by fourth Addl Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural, The Wire says order will not go unchallenged
Online news portal The Wire has published what it calls a ‘gag order’ from the lawyer of Jay Amit Shah, son of BJP President Amit Shah. The “order”, of October 12, 2017, is purportedly of B.K. Dasondi, 4th Addl Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural (Mirzapur), Ahmedabad.
The Wire had published an article about business dealings of Jay Amit Shah, against which Jay has threatened a Rs 100 crore defamation suit against the portal.
We produce The Wire’s statement as it has appeared on its website.
Press statement issued by The Wire:
The Wire received in the afternoon of today, i.e. October 16, 2017, a set of documents in an envelope sent under the name of Milan S. Bhatt, Advocate, Ahmedabad.
There is no covering letter and the entire set appears to be of photocopies. Among these are the following
- Special Civil Suit No.442/2017 filed by Jay Amit Shah in the Court of the Fourth Additional Senior Civil Judge Ahmedabad Rural (Mirzapur) Ahmedabad .
- Application praying for an interim injunction pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit.
- Text purporting to be Order Below Exhibit 5 SPCS No.442/2017 dated October 12, 2017, of B.K. Dasondi, 4th Addl Senior Civil Judge, Ahmedabad Rural (Mirzapur), Ahmedabad, which reads verbatim as follows:
“Pending hearing and final disposal of the interim Injunction, defendants are restrained by order ad-interim injunction from using and publishing or printing in any electronic, print, digital or any other media, or broadcast,telecast, print and publish in any manner including by way of interview, holding TV talks, debate and debates, news items, programs in any language on the basis of the article published in ‘THE WIRE ‘ (dated 8/10/2010) either directly or indirectly on the subject matter with respect to the plaintiff in any manner whatsoever.”
PICTURE HERE: AHMEDABAD_WIRE)
- The order is signed illegibly and faintly in some script appearing to be Devnagari-like.
The Wire was neither served notice nor given an opportunity to be heard before this ex-parte injunction was sought and granted.
It will be evident to anyone reading the Special Civil Suit that no single factual error has been substantively shown or pleaded against The Wire. No case of untruth has been made out against The Wire. Indeed, the plaint acknowledges that the full text of the lawyer’s exchange with The Wire was available on the website on the date of filing the suit, which is shown as October 12, 2017. Incidentally October 12, 2017 is also the date of the text of Order. The time of filing the suit or of the passing of “Order below Exhibit 5” is not available with The Wire.
It goes without saying that this attempt to gag The Wire will not go unchallenged.